Jev Combined with Legal Workflows
A user suggests combining Jev with Astra could supercharge legal workflows, highlighting its potential in legal compliance.
Jev's disagreement log on 13% of court rulings: a classifier can't just be vibes with JSON
The author praises Jev for logging disagreements on 13% of well-known court rulings, argues classifiers need fail-case records, and asks what first judgment would never be auto-approved in a typed system.
Jev disagreeing with 13% of well-known court rulings is exactly the demo I wanted. My take: a classifier without a disagreement log is just vibes with JSON. I want the fail cases in the harness, not the marketing. What's the first judgment you'd never auto-approve from a typed
· 0 likesOpen on X
More like this
Jev completes Traditional Chinese traffic-accident legal analysis in one API call
A user tested TypeSafe AI's Jev on an 11-page AI-written Traditional Chinese traffic-accident analysis, producing 15 typed decisions (5 legal findings × 3 questions) in one API call: 831 ms end-to-end, ~$0.0003 (7,645 input tokens; output free), and 15/15 schema passes.
Building a Legal Chatbot Database Router with Jev
A developer shares a classifier test built with TypeSafe AI's Jev (via OpenRouter) to determine which database a legal chatbot should search.
