Jev beats Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on classifier eval quality and speed
Malte Ubl ran TypeSafe AI's Jev against an existing classifier eval, where it saturated the eval on quality and was 6x faster than Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite.
Testing Jev's accuracy 662 times with two Kaggle datasets
The author ran 662 accuracy tests on Jev using Kaggle's SMS Spam Collection and Banking77 datasets, with surprising results.
How accurate is Jev, really? I tested it with two Kaggle datasets 662 times, and the results were a bit surprising. I used datasets from Kaggle: - SMS Spam Collection: 5,574 English text messages, sampled 200 for a smoke test - Banking77: 13,000 real banking app queries, 77
· 11 likesOpen on X
More like this
Fast row classification in DuckDB with Jev
The author released a DuckDB extension that uses TypeSafe AI's Jev to quickly classify rows in CSV/Parquet files or DuckDB tables, taking about 10 seconds for 1k rows—faster than an LLM and more ergonomic than a classifier.
Classifying 1,018 AI Papers with Jev for $0.08
The author summarized each paper with DeepSeek V4 Flash, then sent the title, summary, and 24 candidate topics to Jev for classification, processing 1,018 AI papers at $0.08 total cost and 256ms median end-to-end latency per paper.
