Jev beats Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on classifier eval quality and speed
Malte Ubl ran TypeSafe AI's Jev against an existing classifier eval, where it saturated the eval on quality and was 6x faster than Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite.
Jev’s Cost Edge: People Data for Less
The post compares people-data costs across ContactOut, Clay Growth, and ZoomInfo, and points to Jev by TypeSafe AI as the obvious choice.
People data at a fraction of the cost. @MonidHQ’s ContactOut charges just $0.02 per enrichment call, while phone and work email lookups are free. Clay Growth runs $446/month, and ZoomInfo’s median annual cost hits $33.5K. Jev by @typesafeai makes the choice obvious.
· 3 likesOpen on X
More like this
Fast row classification in DuckDB with Jev
The author released a DuckDB extension that uses TypeSafe AI's Jev to quickly classify rows in CSV/Parquet files or DuckDB tables, taking about 10 seconds for 1k rows—faster than an LLM and more ergonomic than a classifier.
Classifying 1,018 AI Papers with Jev for $0.08
The author summarized each paper with DeepSeek V4 Flash, then sent the title, summary, and 24 candidate topics to Jev for classification, processing 1,018 AI papers at $0.08 total cost and 256ms median end-to-end latency per paper.
