Jev versus text-generating models
Jev does not generate free-form text. A side-by-side video compares parallel decision-making with token-by-token text generation.
Jev repeatedly fails FizzBuzz test
A user ran Jev through FizzBuzz 10,000 times, finding a 77% failure rate, almost always on the same number, with Jev confidently treating 56 as divisible by 5 at 0.18-0.30 confidence.
I ran Jev through FizzBuzz 10,000 times. And it failed 77% of the time, and almost always on the exact same number. For whatever reason, Jev seems to really think that the number 56 is divisible by 5, and it does so with a confidence between 0.18-0.30. I have no idea what it
· 0 likesOpen on X
More like this
Pricing, evaluations, and the name Jev
The launch thread explains code-and-AI workflow evaluations, the input price announced at launch, and free output tokens.
Jev Model: Decision-Making Probability Generation, 200× Faster and 400× Cheaper Than LLMs
This model is built for decision-making rather than text generation, outputting probabilities for each option in parallel instead of token-by-token responses. The author shares a simplified comparison of normal LLMs versus this Jev model.
